NOAA Updates its Seasonal Outlook on December 19, 2024 – Emerging Weak, Short La Nina Conditions – Posted on December 20, 2024
On the third Thursday of the month right on schedule NOAA issued their updated Seasonal Outlook which I describe as their Four-Season Outlook because it extends a bit more than one year into the future. The information released also included the Mid-Month Outlook for the following month plus the weather and drought outlook for the next three months. I present the information issued by NOAA and try to add context to it. It is quite a challenge for NOAA to address the subsequent month, the subsequent three-month period as well as the twelve successive three-month periods for a year or a bit more.
With respect to the long-term part of the Outlook which I call the Four-Season Outlook, the timing of the transition from Neutral to LaNina has been challenging to predict. But there is more confidence in the situation for the moment. We are still in ENSO Neutral. La Nina is the likely scenario very soon, but the strength of the La Nina may be fairly weak. The transition from ENSO Neutral to La Nina is complicated as is the transition from La Nino back to ENSO Neutral. We may have both of these transitions in the three-month period January through March. So even if we have La Nina conditions for two or three months this period of time will probably not be recorded as a La Nina event because of the short duration. Every ten years the definition of climate normals are changed (it may be every five years for oceans) and some ENSO events are canceled and others are promoted to El Nino or La Nina status. This applies to the ONI status only as they do not reexamine the connection with the atmosphere. The warming of the oceans may very well make our definition of the states of ENSO incorrect. NOAA is looking at that.
From the NOAA discussion:
“El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-neutral conditions are present, as equatorial sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are near-to-below average in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean. During the last four weeks, mostly negative SST anomaly changes were evident across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. As such, a La Niña Watch is in effect, with La Niña conditions most likely to emerge in November 2024 – January 2025 (NDJ) (59% chance) and is expected to persist through February-April (FMA) 2025. In fact, the latest weekly Nino 3.4 SST departure was -0.6 degrees Celsius, which technically crosses the La Niña threshold. However, chances of a strong La Niña are exceedingly small, with a near zero percent chance of occurrence through the Winter. ENSO-neutral conditions are favored to re-emerge by the March-May (MAM) 2025 season.”
I personally would not have total confidence in this outlook given the uncertainty about there actually being a La Nina and its strength and duration if it does happen. The number of El Nino and La Nina events since 1950 is a fairly small number. When you further segment them by strength (LINK) you end up with a very small number of events in each category (El Nino v La Nina and three or four categories of strength within each of perhaps 7 subcategories. This makes both statistical methods and dynamical models have a large error range. We are pretty confident now that we will have either a weak La Nina or Neutral with a La Nina bias meaning it will be in the Neutral Range but closer to a La Nina than an El Nino. This suggests that there is value in this forecast. The maps show the level of confidence that NOAA (really the NOAA Climate Prediction Center) has for the outlook shown when they show a part of the U.S. or Alaska differing from normal.
It will be updated on the last day of November.
Then we look at a graphic that shows both the next month and the next three months.
The top row is what is now called the Mid-Month Outlook for next month which will be updated at the end of this month. There is a temperature map and a precipitation map. The second row is a three-month outlook that includes next month. I think the outlook maps are self-explanatory. What is important to remember is that they show deviations from the current definition of normal which is the period 1991 through 2020. So this is not a forecast of the absolute value of temperature or precipitation but the change from what is defined as normal or to use the technical term “climatology”.
Notice that the Outlook for next month and the three-month Outlook are fairly similar except for temperatures in the Northwest and Alaska. This tells us that February and March will be substantially the same as January for most of CONUS. Part of the explanation for this is that NOAA expects La Nina to impact all three months. |
–