NOAA Updates their Four-Season Outlook on January 20, 2022

Introduction

Today is the third Thursday of the month so right on schedule NOAA has issued their Seasonal Outlook. In this article I summarize it and provide links that will take the reader to additional maps and discussions that I have not included but I have included quite a bit in this article. I want to remind everyone that last Thursday NOAA issued their ENSO outlook and that has a lot of influence on their Seasonal Outlook.  The Seasonal Outlook generally reflects La Nina conditions initially with a transition to ENSO Neutral in late Spring. Over the next three months, the Southern Tier drought intensifies but there is relief in the Northwest extending east but not reaching the Dakotas.

Combination Early Outlook for February and Three-Month Forecast.

I am going to start with a graphic that shows both the Early Outlook for February and also the three-month forecast FMA 2022. So you get the full picture in one graphic.
The top row is the so-called Early Outlook for February which will be updated at the end of January. There is a temperature map and a precipitation map. The second row is a three-month forecast that includes February. I think they are self-explanatory. What is important to remember is that they show deviations from the current definition of normal which is the period 1991 through 2020.  So this is not a forecast of the absolute value of temperature or precipitation but the change from what is defined as normal or to use the technical term climatology.

Drought Forecast

NOAA also issues a drought forecast which is tied to the precipitation and temperature forecasts plus the initial conditions. That means if the ground is wet it takes a change to move it to drought and if the ground is dry it takes a change to move it out of drought.
The yellow is the bad news. And this is a three-month forecast plus the remainder of January. There is a lot of yellow. The Northwest extending to the east is the major exception.

Looking out Four-Seasons.

I am going to include the twelve Temperature maps now.

Notice that this presentation starts with March/April/May (MAM) since FMA is considered the near-term. So on the first row you have MAM followed by AMJ followed by MJJ. Then when you drop down to the second row you have from left to right JJA, JAS, ASO and on the next row, SON, OND, NDJ as you move into 2023. And then on the bottom row you have DJF, JFM and FMA 2023.
You can see the changes over time. The big changes take place starting in MJJ 2022 and this becomes very noticeable in NDJ 2022/2023 which is a while out.  This is probably discussed in the discussion. Remember that the dynamical/numerical models are only used for a couple of months and then they switch over to statistical models. In the short term, current conditions have a big impact on the forecast. But because these models are not perfect at some point past history becomes more reliable. So long-term trends and the project status of ENSO and perhaps some other factors that lend themselves to statistical analysis is what you see beyond a couple of months in this four-season forecast.

I am going to include the twelve Precipitation maps now.

Similar to Temperature what we see here is on the first row March/April/May (MAM) since FMA is considered the near-term. So on the first row you have MAM followed by AMJ followed by MJJ. Then when you drop down to the second row you have from left to right JJA, JAS, ASO and on the next row, SON, OND, NDJ as you move into 2023. And then on the bottom row you have DJF, JFM and FMA 2023.

You can see the changes over time. The big changes take place starting in MJJ 2022 and this becomes very noticeable in NDJ 2022/2023 which is a while out.  This is probably discussed in the discussion. Remember that the dynamical/numerical models are only used for a couple of months and then they switch over to statistical models. In the short term, current conditions have a big impact on the forecast. But because these models are not perfect at some point past history becomes more reliable. So long-term trends and the project status of ENSO and perhaps some other factors that lend themselves to statistical analysis is what you see beyond a couple of months in this four-season forecast.
You can see the major changes that start with JJA and more changes in ASO.  I need to look at this some more as the changes in temperature and precipitation usually line up pretty well. But there are a lot of changes shown in both temperature and precipitation as the pattern unfolds.

NOAA Discussion

Maps tell a story but to really understand what is going you need to read the discussion. I combine the 30-day discussion with the long-term discussion and rearrange it a bit and add a few additional titles (where they are not all caps the titles are my additions).

Let’s see if I have any comments to make. I think mostly I will use bold type to highlight some things that are important. My comments if any are enclosed in brackets [ ].

CURRENT ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC CONDITIONS

Oceanic and atmospheric observations reflect La Niña conditions. In December 2021, below-average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) across the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean were consistent with a mature La Niña. With the exception of the westernmost Niño-4 region, which warmed to -0.2°C at the end of the December, the other Niño indices were between -0.4°C and -1.1°C during the first week of Jan 2022. Below-average subsurface temperatures weakened east of the Date Line, reflecting the slow eastward movement of positive temperature anomalies, at depth, from the western into the central Pacific Ocean. However, below-average subsurface temperatures still dominated the eastern Tropical Pacific from ~200m to the surface. Low-level easterly wind anomalies and upper-level westerly wind anomalies prevailed over the east-central and eastern Pacific Ocean. Enhanced convection persisted near Indonesia and the western Pacific, while suppressed convection remained over the Date Line.

The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) weakened during early Jan after slow propagating across the Western Pacific during December. Destructive interference with the ongoing La Niña has likely resulted in the weakening, though the Niño4 SST index was also likely slightly warmer due to this interaction. The MJO is not likely to play a large role in the observed seasonal patterns of temperature and precipitation.

PROGNOSTIC DISCUSSION OF SST FORECASTS

The CPC SST consolidation for the Niño-3.4 region depicts negative SST anomalies remaining at or below -0.5 degrees C through FMA and then near average from the late spring through the summer and autumn of 2022. The North American Multi Model Ensemble (NMME) ensemble mean forecast for the Niño-3.4 SST anomaly depicts a slightly slower transition to near average during the next six months. The official CPC/IRI ENSO outlook is for La Niña to continue into the Northern Hemisphere spring (67% chance during MAM 2022) and then transition to ENSO-neutral (51% chance during AMJ 2022).[We discussed this in an article last week https://econcurrents.com/2022/01/14/noaa-extends-la-nina-forecast/  ]

30-DAY OUTLOOK DISCUSSION FOR FEBRUARY 2022

La Niña conditions persist across the equatorial Pacific, with persistent negative SST anomalies in recent weeks over much of the east-central Pacific Ocean. Convection continues to be suppressed near the Date Line. Low-level easterly winds are enhanced over parts of the east-central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, while upper-level westerly winds  are enhanced across most of the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. The RMM-based Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) index indicates MJO conditions have weakened, and there is no clear MJO signal in most dynamical model forecasts. The ECMWF and CFSv2 however forecast a potential reemergence of the active phase of the MJO in the western Pacific in the next couple weeks. Though La Niña is forecasted to persist into boreal spring, dynamical model forecasts for the next several weeks into the beginning of February are inconsistent with a canonical La Niña pattern. However, given uncertainty in subseasonal variability later in February, the La Niña base state and typical impacts of La Niña are reflected in the dynamical model temperature and precipitation forecasts for February and play a significant role in the February temperature and precipitation outlooks. The February 2022 monthly temperature and precipitation outlooks are based primarily on dynamical model forecast guidance from the North America Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) and statistical forecast guidance, including the constructed analog, canonical correlation analysis, and ENSO-OCN tools. Both dynamical and statistical models are largely forced by persistent La Niña conditions. Although La Niña conditions are expected to transition to ENSO neutral conditions in the late spring, February climate conditions are expected to be impacted by La Niña. In addition, the outlooks for some areas of the forecast domain consider current land surface soil moisture and snow cover and nearby ocean surface temperatures.

Temperature

The February 2022 temperature outlook favors below-normal temperatures for the south coast of Alaska east of the Alaska Peninsula, southeastern Mainland Alaska, and the Alaska Panhandle, supported by dynamical model guidance from the NMME, as well as the consolidation of statistical and dynamical temperature tools. Below-normal temperatures are also favored for parts of Northern California, the Pacific Northwest, the Northern Rockies, and the northern High Plains, consistent with canonical La Niña impacts. Statistical guidance and the latest CFSv2 dynamical model forecasts suggest the potential for more extensive below-normal temperatures into the Northern Plains and Midwest region, reflecting potential impacts of La Niña. The potential for larger scale below-normal temperatures into the Midwest is also associated with the possible reemergence of Western Pacific MJO activity. This pattern of large-scale below-normal temperatures is inconsistent with the consolidated NMME forecast, as well as the consolidation of both statistical and dynamical model guidance, which favor above-normal temperatures for much of the central and eastern CONUS. The February outlook favors above-normal temperatures across much of the southwestern CONUS from Southern California across the Southern and Central Rockies into the Southern and Central Plains, supported by both NMME dynamical model forecasts and the consolidation. Above-normal temperatures are favored for parts of the Lower and Central Mississippi Valley, eastern areas of the Midwest, and the Eastern Seaboard, primarily supported by dynamical model forecasts from the NMME. Probabilities of above-normal temperatures are greatest, exceeding 50 percent, from parts of the Southwest along the Rio Grande Valley and Gulf Coast to the Florida Peninsula, as well as for much of the Northeast, where dynamical model forecasts are consistent. A large area of equal chances of below-, near-, and above-normal temperatures is predicted for much of the Northern Plains and western Great Lakes region, where there is inconsistency among temperature tools.

Precipitation

The February outlook favors above-normal precipitation for northwestern Mainland Alaska and below-normal precipitation for the south coast of Mainland Alaska and parts of the northern Alaska Panhandle, supported by dynamical model forecasts and consistent with La Niña impacts. Dynamical models  predict above-normal precipitation for parts of the Alaska Panhandle early in the month, resulting in a forecast of equal chances in the February outlook. Above-normal precipitation is favored for much of the Pacific Northwest eastward across the Northern Rockies into the northern High Plains, consistent with most dynamical and statistical model forecasts and canonical La Niña impacts. Above-normal precipitation is also likely from the Central Mississippi and Ohio Valleys northward across most of the Great Lakes region, following canonical La Niña patterns and the consolidation of precipitation forecast tools. Below-normal precipitation is likely across the southern tier of the CONUS, including most of the Southwest, parts of the Southern Plains, the Gulf Coast, the southern Atlantic coast, and the Florida Peninsula. The February precipitation outlook generally reflects canonical precipitation patterns due to La Niña. Equal chances of below-, near-, and above-normal precipitation is predicted where there is greater uncertainty among precipitation tools.

SUMMARY OF THE OUTLOOK FOR NON-TECHNICAL USERS (Focus on February-March-April 2022)

Temperature

The February-March-April (FMA) 2022 temperature outlook favors above-normal seasonal mean temperatures from the Southwest, across the Central and Southern Plains, to the entire eastern third of the contiguous U.S. The largest probabilities (above 60 percent) for above-normal temperatures are forecast across the Rio Grande Valley. Probabilities of below-normal temperatures are elevated for parts of the northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, northern California, and much of Alaska.

Precipitation

The FMA 2022 precipitation outlook favors below-normal seasonal precipitation amounts from southern California and the Southwest to the central and southern Great Plains, then east to parts of the Southeast. Below-normal precipitation is slightly favored for most of coastal southern Mainland Alaska and the Alaska Panhandle. Above-normal seasonal precipitation amounts are most likely across the Great Lakes, Ohio and Tennessee Valleys, northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and much of northern and western Mainland Alaska. Equal chances (EC) are forecast among areas where seasonal mean temperatures and seasonal accumulated precipitation amounts are expected to be similar to climatological probabilities.

BASIS AND SUMMARY OF THE CURRENT LONG-LEAD OUTLOOKS

PROGNOSTIC TOOLS USED FOR U.S. TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION OUTLOOKS

Dynamical model guidance such as the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) and the Calibration, Bridging, and Merging (CBaM) version of the NMME were used through lead 5.  La Niña temperature and precipitation composites were a major tool relied upon through MAM 2022. The consolidation tool, which includes NMME input and various statistical tools, was also used especially after the predicted transition to ENSO-neutral conditions by late spring. At longer leads, such as 7-13 (ASO 2022 – FMA 2023), trends  (as represented by OCN) played a larger role.

PROGNOSTIC DISCUSSION OF OUTLOOKS – FMA 2022 TO FMA 2023

TEMPERATURE

Only minor adjustments were made to the previous temperature outlooks, released in Dec 2021, as La Niña continues to be the major contributor to the predicted climate state during FMA and MAM 2022. Odds for above normal temperatures were decreased across Southern CA and Arizona, reflecting the latest model guidance and consolidations. Odds for above normal temperatures were increased in the Rio Grande, as the confidence around La Niña and the corresponding impacts are just slightly higher as the lead time to FMA is now shorter.  Correspondingly, odds for below normal temperatures were increased for parts of southeastern Mainland Alaska and the Alaska Panhandle. Through the spring of 2022, odds for above normal temperatures were increased across much of the Upper Mississippi Valley in response to the latest model guidance and a current lack of snowpack, which is not likely to recover dramatically. This outlook is contrary to the signal from trends  in that region, so odds are modest. The summer (JJA) 2022 temperature outlook generally favors above normal temperatures, with only a small reduction in the odds made over the Northern Rockies as compared to last months’ outlooks, as new model guidance for that period indicates a cooler signal. The outlooks for JAS 2022 through JFM remain largely unchanged, reflecting OCN based information.

PRECIPITATION

The precipitation outlooks for FMA and MAM 2022 are consistent with La Niña composites and recent model guidance. Increased odds for above normal precipitation in the Ohio Valley and in the Northern Rockies reflect a bit more amplified pattern and reduced uncertainty relative to last month’s outlooks due to shorter lead time. That increased certainty is also translated to the MAM 2022 outlook, where odds of below normal precipitation were increased in the Four Corners region, and a slight tilt toward above normal precipitation was added to the northwestern CONUS, reflecting the latest model guidance. Outlooks for AMJ through JJA were modestly adjusted to reflect the latest model guidance and ensure continuity in the outlooks. Further out in the outlook package, JJA through SON, trends  and a consolidation of statistical tools were the main inputs for the outlooks from JAS 2022 through FMA 2023. The outlooks for JAS through OND generally favor below normal precipitation across an area from the Central Rockies to the Pacific Northwest and above normal precipitation in the Ohio Valley.  For next winter, the outlooks reflect the longer-term trends.

Resources

All the maps should transmit but if not I am providing the links. Also the links may lead to larger images for those who would find that to be helpful.
You can also find these maps individually on the CPC.NCEP Main Page. You can get to a lot of places from there but to make it easy here is the monthly discussion   and here is the long-term discussion which includes the state of the Atmosphere.   I have shown it in the text later in this email.
The image showing the Early Outlook for February and the three-month forecast can be obtained  by Clicking Here.
All of the three-month maps and the graphic that shows all twelve of them can be found here.   It goes out to Feb-Mar-Apr 2023. I like this graphic as you can see the forecast change in the pattern as La Nina comes and goes plus factoring in the seasonal trends.
The link for the drought forecast map and some discussions that come with the map can be found by clicking HERE.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *